Consumer Reports
Here is a copy of the e-mail thjat I have sent him.
Quote
Domestic Fuel act and E55.
I have major concerns about E15. Although it may be good for some of the newer vehicles, when it comes to the older ones, the fuel lines can be damaged to the point of leaking fuel, possibly causing a fire on a vehicle. Also, it causes the engine to run hotter, which will lead to a shorter life span for the engine due to the added wear to the engine components. The added ethanol also "washes" the cylinders of the necessary oil to keep engine life to a maximum. Lowering this life will cause more people to have to use the money that they may not have to acquire another vehicle. The economy has not picked up enough for those expenses that the middle and lower class of wage earners will then be burdened with.
I know that I do not want E15 in my Harley Davidson, an air cooled engine that needs as little additional heat added to it as possible, let alone the fuel lines that could be damaged. I also own a 1994 Honda and a 1997 Jeep that would have major issues with the fuel lines due to the added ethanol.
Has there really been a study done by a non-biased company? Is the information you are basing your Domestic Fuel Act on been reviewed by a party that is not part of the fuel, or alternative fuel, industry? What about expensive tests to air cooled engines and older vehicles that will acquire fuel system damages due to the added ethanol? Does the lower fuel mileage using E15 add more cost to the American citizen that staying with a lower ethanol addition?
I understand the need to get away from foreign oil imports, and going to various types of alternative fuel sources, but please make sure that the older vehicles are compatible with the recommendations that you are suggesting in your Domestic Fuel Act.
The following information can be found on the Consumer Reports website, http://www.consumerr...rview/index.htm
"... Fuel economy, however, dropped across the board. In highway driving, gas mileage decreased from 21 to 15 mpg; in city driving, it dropped from 9 to 7 mpg. You could expect a similar decrease in gas mileage in any current FFV." (FFV is referring to a fossil fuel vehicle.)
"...We also took our Tahoe to a state-certified emissions-test facility near our test track in Connecticut and had a standard emissions test performed. We found a significant decrease in smog-forming oxides of nitrogen when using E85. However, ethanol emits acetaldehyde, which the EPA lists as a probable carcinogen and something that standard emissions-testing equipment is not designed to measure..."
Realize I am going to relay this information, and the fact that you are the originator for the Domestic Fuel Act, to everyone I know.
I have major concerns about E15. Although it may be good for some of the newer vehicles, when it comes to the older ones, the fuel lines can be damaged to the point of leaking fuel, possibly causing a fire on a vehicle. Also, it causes the engine to run hotter, which will lead to a shorter life span for the engine due to the added wear to the engine components. The added ethanol also "washes" the cylinders of the necessary oil to keep engine life to a maximum. Lowering this life will cause more people to have to use the money that they may not have to acquire another vehicle. The economy has not picked up enough for those expenses that the middle and lower class of wage earners will then be burdened with.
I know that I do not want E15 in my Harley Davidson, an air cooled engine that needs as little additional heat added to it as possible, let alone the fuel lines that could be damaged. I also own a 1994 Honda and a 1997 Jeep that would have major issues with the fuel lines due to the added ethanol.
Has there really been a study done by a non-biased company? Is the information you are basing your Domestic Fuel Act on been reviewed by a party that is not part of the fuel, or alternative fuel, industry? What about expensive tests to air cooled engines and older vehicles that will acquire fuel system damages due to the added ethanol? Does the lower fuel mileage using E15 add more cost to the American citizen that staying with a lower ethanol addition?
I understand the need to get away from foreign oil imports, and going to various types of alternative fuel sources, but please make sure that the older vehicles are compatible with the recommendations that you are suggesting in your Domestic Fuel Act.
The following information can be found on the Consumer Reports website, http://www.consumerr...rview/index.htm
"... Fuel economy, however, dropped across the board. In highway driving, gas mileage decreased from 21 to 15 mpg; in city driving, it dropped from 9 to 7 mpg. You could expect a similar decrease in gas mileage in any current FFV." (FFV is referring to a fossil fuel vehicle.)
"...We also took our Tahoe to a state-certified emissions-test facility near our test track in Connecticut and had a standard emissions test performed. We found a significant decrease in smog-forming oxides of nitrogen when using E85. However, ethanol emits acetaldehyde, which the EPA lists as a probable carcinogen and something that standard emissions-testing equipment is not designed to measure..."
Realize I am going to relay this information, and the fact that you are the originator for the Domestic Fuel Act, to everyone I know.
If you feel the same way I do, let your congressmen know, as well as Senator Johanns.
We put them in ofice, it's our job to keep them in line with what WE want, not what they want.